When we asked Hazm about the news, they said that those Nusra members were not prisoners in their captivity and that they did not kill them, and further knew nothing about them. It depends on the fighters and leaders located in those areas. As for their treatment of people living under their control, it differs from place to place for both brigades. I don't know if Nusra is right or wrong when they talk about Hazm that way. What do residents think of the fighting that occurred between the two groups in the Western Aleppo countryside? Also, did Hazm really disband itself? We can't determine the real reasons behind the attack, but we can determine the professed reasons.
Uploader: | Kajimuro |
Date Added: | 27 October 2010 |
File Size: | 33.26 Mb |
Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
Downloads: | 18379 |
Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
We intervened to stop the fighting jaabha the two sides, but the intervention was late and we arrived at the scene of the battle late, because we did not expect the fighting to happen that quickly. Why did Nusra assault on Fauj 46, belonging to Harakat Hazm, and its killing of more than 50 fighters? As you know, Hazm held Nusra prisoners, and vice-versa, but Nusra was told by al-Jabha a-Shamiya that four of its prisoners, including Abu Aisa a-Tabqa, an emir, were killed in Hazm custody.
basbous rap اغاني تحميل
I don't think that Hazm will respond at the current time, especially after it dissolved itself and joined al-Jabha a-Shamiya and other battalions. Nusra began the kidnapping operations, accusing fighters from Hazm of aiding the Syrian Revolutionaries' Front.
Most of the residents of the Fauj 46 area and Al-Atarib are families and sons of fighters in Harakat Hazm. Al-Jabha a-Shamiya, which represents the arbitrator in the conflict between both sides—what is their opinion of Nusra and Hazm rapp terms of their regime-fighting capacity, and how they treat people in areas under their control?
Except for the fact that Nusra considers Hazm a brigade backed by America. Director of the Syrian Network for Human Rights: What were the real reasons that pushed some factions of Hazm, after Nusra attacked, to split off from the group and join up with other brigades?
Jabga couldn't do that because we didn't know with certainty that they would kill them, or that they had them in custody, especially considering Hazm never said that officially.
But I don't accuse a-Nusra of arresting Hazm fighters unjustly, or vice-versa—both of them acted badly towards the other. As for their treatment of people living under their control, it differs from place to place for both brigades. Both sides accused the other of kidnapping mujahideen, and in reality both did it.
March jabhw, After trading mutual accusations of sabotaging rebel operations and kidnapping each other's fighters, Jabhat kabha and Harakat Hazm went to war last week jabhx the western Aleppo countryside.
The accusations of mutual kidnappings that precipitated the conflict are true, Monzer Alsallala member of al-Jabha a-Shamiya, the mediator between the two factions, tells Syria Direct's Muatasem Jamal.
We can't determine the real reasons behind the attack, but we can determine the professed reasons. So they chose strong, moderate brigades from the FSA to join, so no one would attack them and so they could stay on the battlefield.
rap DZ USA remix / RABAH MBS feat 2PAC () - DJ-MOUHA DJ-SID
But in any case, Nusra was wary of Hazm merely because they thought that one day they would go to war. After trading mutual accusations of sabotaging rebel operations and kidnapping each other's fighters, Jabhat a-Nusra and Harakat Hazm went to war last week in the western Aleppo countryside.
Al-Jabha a-Shamiya considers both brigades good at ral the regime and having a noticeable impact on the Aleppo fronts.
There's another group whose sons are fighters with Nusra, so the street is split, but the majority are supporters of Hazm because the locals are the ones who created Hazm in the area. Since the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War in the spring ofhumanitarian monitoring and docum In general, the reasons that pushed some factions in Hazm to separate from the group and join other brigades, not just al-Jabha a-Shamia but also FSA brigades, like Kataib Ibn Taimia, was that these groups were neutral, and saw that the mistake was not theirs, just as they wanted to keep fighting against the regime and guarantee their safety with Jabhat a-Nusra.
What are the practical steps that al-Jabha a-Shamiya undertook to stop the fighting? In his rap vide Why wasn't al-Jabha a-Shamiya able to prevent Harakat Hazm from killing the Nusra emirs, despite the fact that it accepted rzp responsibility for that in an announcement?
It depends on the fighters and leaders located in those areas. Nusra spoils from the Fauj 46 battle.
Wa3ed sharaf part 2 download
When we asked Hazm about the news, they said that those Nusra members were not prisoners in their captivity and that they did not kill them, and further knew nothing about them. Mabha, did Hazm really disband jabna With each new story of displacement Ahmed lives out, he recalls the details of his house, the windo Among other operations, Nusra took out rival Harakat Hazm's headquarters of Fauj 46 last Friday, leading Hazm to officially announce its dissolution March 1.
As for the rest of the battalions, jaba asked them to intervene but they only sent messages to both sides pleading with them not to fight, and they excused their absence by saying they were busy fighting on fronts against the regime. Then Nusra responded and took more members from Hazm, and so on. The last event to occur was Hazm arresting a number of Nusra's leaders.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий